<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[CraftPath Cannabis]]></title><description><![CDATA[Science-backed cannabis education for people who take the craft seriously. Growing, edibles, extraction, and the dispensary floor — taught by working operators.]]></description><link>https://blog.craftpathacademy.com</link><generator>Substack</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 05:09:15 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.craftpathacademy.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><copyright><![CDATA[CraftPath Academy]]></copyright><language><![CDATA[en]]></language><webMaster><![CDATA[craftpathcannabis@substack.com]]></webMaster><itunes:owner><itunes:email><![CDATA[craftpathcannabis@substack.com]]></itunes:email><itunes:name><![CDATA[CraftPath Cannabis]]></itunes:name></itunes:owner><itunes:author><![CDATA[CraftPath Cannabis]]></itunes:author><googleplay:owner><![CDATA[craftpathcannabis@substack.com]]></googleplay:owner><googleplay:email><![CDATA[craftpathcannabis@substack.com]]></googleplay:email><googleplay:author><![CDATA[CraftPath Cannabis]]></googleplay:author><itunes:block><![CDATA[Yes]]></itunes:block><item><title><![CDATA[Decarboxylation Methods Compared: Oven vs. Mason Jar vs. Sous Vide]]></title><description><![CDATA[If you skip decarboxylation, you&#8217;ve already lost.]]></description><link>https://blog.craftpathacademy.com/p/decarboxylation-methods-compared</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.craftpathacademy.com/p/decarboxylation-methods-compared</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[CraftPath Cannabis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 23:57:41 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!k1kd!,w_256,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F4d980f23-3073-46a5-9334-792e0dfdf8a8_491x491.png" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you skip decarboxylation, you&#8217;ve already lost. Raw cannabis won&#8217;t get you high no matter how long you simmer it in butter, because the THC isn&#8217;t active yet. It&#8217;s locked up as THCA, the acidic precursor that lives in the live plant. Heat is the key that unlocks it. The catch is that not all heat is equal, and the method you choose decides how much of your THC survives the process versus how much you cook off into vapor and degradation.</p><p></p><p>Three methods dominate the home edibles world: the oven, the sealed mason jar, and sous vide. Here&#8217;s how they actually compare.</p><p></p><h2>What Decarboxylation Actually Does</h2><p>Decarboxylation is a chemical reaction, not just &#8220;drying out your weed.&#8221; Heat drives a carboxyl group off the THCA molecule, releasing it as carbon dioxide and water vapor and leaving behind active THC. This is also why your decarbing flower bubbles and smells loud: you&#8217;re literally watching CO2 escape.</p><p></p><p>The reaction is governed by time and temperature, and the two trade off against each other. Too hot and you flip past activation into degradation, where THC starts converting to CBN, the sedating, less psychoactive breakdown product. Too cool and you never finish the conversion, leaving THCA on the table. The widely cited sweet spot is roughly 240&#176;F (115&#176;C) for 30 to 40 minutes, which converts the bulk of THCA without pushing hard into CBN territory. Terpenes, the volatile aromatic compounds that shape flavor and effect, start boiling off well below that, some as low as 120&#176;F, which is why aggressive decarbing produces a flatter, more &#8220;generic&#8221; high.</p><p></p><h2>The Oven Method</h2><p>The oven is the default for a reason: everyone has one, and it works. Grind your flower coarsely, spread it on a parchment-lined tray, and bake at 240&#176;F for 30 to 40 minutes, stirring once at the halfway mark so the outer material doesn&#8217;t scorch while the center lags.</p><p></p><p>The problem is the oven&#8217;s honesty, or lack of it. Home oven thermostats routinely swing 20 to 30&#176;F from their setpoint, cycling above and below as the element kicks on and off. A &#8220;240&#176;F&#8221; oven might spike to 270&#176;F repeatedly, and those spikes are where you lose THC and terpenes. The other downside is smell: an open tray of decarbing flower will perfume your entire home for hours. Use an oven thermometer to verify the real temperature, and don&#8217;t trust the dial alone.</p><p></p><p>Best for: people who want zero special equipment and don&#8217;t mind the smell or the variance.</p><p></p><h2>The Mason Jar Method</h2><p>The mason jar is the same oven process with one upgrade: you seal the ground flower in a quart canning jar before baking at 240&#176;F for about 40 to 45 minutes, giving it a slightly longer run since the glass insulates and heats more gradually. Some cooks shake the jar every 15 minutes.</p><p></p><p>The sealed jar does two useful things. First, it traps the terpenes that would otherwise evaporate off an open tray, and when the jar cools, much of that aromatic vapor recondenses back onto the flower, preserving flavor and the fuller effect profile. Second, it contains most of the smell. The tradeoff is that you&#8217;re still subject to your oven&#8217;s temperature swings, and there&#8217;s a small but real pressure consideration: never seal the jar so tight that it can&#8217;t vent, and let it cool before opening. Many cooks rest the lid on loosely rather than torquing it down.</p><p></p><p>Best for: oven users who care about preserving terpenes and keeping the house from reeking.</p><p></p><h2>The Sous Vide Method</h2><p>Sous vide is the precision instrument of the three. You vacuum-seal ground flower in a bag, drop it into a water bath held by an immersion circulator at a locked temperature, and let it run. Because water can&#8217;t exceed its boiling point and a good circulator holds within 1&#176;F, you get something the oven can&#8217;t: a temperature that never spikes. The standard run is about 2 hours at 203&#176;F (95&#176;C), a lower temperature and longer time, fully submerged so heat transfer is even.</p><p></p><p>The payoffs are real. Near-total terpene retention, because nothing escapes the sealed bag and the temperature never climbs into the destructive range. Essentially no smell during the process. And the most reproducible results of any method, since the same bag, same bath, and same time gives you the same outcome every batch, which matters enormously if you&#8217;re trying to dose consistently. The cost is gear: you need an immersion circulator and a vacuum sealer, and the longer cook time means more planning.</p><p></p><p>Best for: anyone who takes consistency seriously and is willing to buy two pieces of equipment to get it.</p><p></p><h2>So Which One Wins</h2><p>If you&#8217;re decarbing tonight with nothing but an oven, use it, but verify the real temperature with a thermometer and accept some terpene loss. If you want better flavor and a quieter kitchen without buying anything, the mason jar is a free upgrade over the open tray. But if you&#8217;re making edibles regularly and want batches that come out identical every time, sous vide is the method that removes the variable that wrecks most home decarbs: uncontrolled heat.</p><p></p><p>Whichever you pick, the principle is the same: decarboxylation is the step where potency is won or lost, and treating it as a precise process rather than a vague &#8220;bake it for a while&#8221; is what separates reliable edibles from a gamble.</p><p></p><p>The CraftPath Academy Edibles Mastery Program walks through each decarboxylation method in detail, covering temperatures, timing, and the chemistry behind why they differ, alongside dosing math, infusion techniques, and 25+ original recipes. The course is here: https://www.craftpathacademy.com/products/courses/edibles-mastery-program</p><p></p><p>Prefer to try it at the lowest price? It&#8217;s on Groupon right now: <a href="https://www.groupon.com/deals/craftpath-academy">https://www.groupon.com/deals/craftpath-academy</a> </p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Dosing Math Every Home Edibles Cook Gets Wrong]]></title><description><![CDATA[Most people who make cannabis edibles at home dose by feel.]]></description><link>https://blog.craftpathacademy.com/p/the-dosing-math-every-home-edibles</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.craftpathacademy.com/p/the-dosing-math-every-home-edibles</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[CraftPath Cannabis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 18:40:39 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!k1kd!,w_256,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F4d980f23-3073-46a5-9334-792e0dfdf8a8_491x491.png" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people who make cannabis edibles at home dose by feel. They eyeball the flower, follow a recipe they found online, and hope for the best. Sometimes it works. Often it doesn't &#8212; the batch is too weak, too strong, or wildly inconsistent from one brownie to the next.</p><p></p><div class="subscription-widget-wrap-editor" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://blog.craftpathacademy.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe&quot;,&quot;language&quot;:&quot;en&quot;}" data-component-name="SubscribeWidgetToDOM"><div class="subscription-widget show-subscribe"><div class="preamble"><p class="cta-caption">Thanks for reading CraftPath Cannabis! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.</p></div><form class="subscription-widget-subscribe"><input type="email" class="email-input" name="email" placeholder="Type your email&#8230;" tabindex="-1"><input type="submit" class="button primary" value="Subscribe"><div class="fake-input-wrapper"><div class="fake-input"></div><div class="fake-button"></div></div></form></div></div><p>This isn't a skill problem. It's a math problem. And the math isn't hard once you know what you're actually calculating.</p><p></p><p>Here's what most home cooks miss.</p><p></p><p>The Number on the Label Is Not What You Get</p><p></p><p>Say you pick up an eighth of flower with 22% THC on the label. You might assume that a gram of that flower contains 220mg of THC. It doesn't &#8212; at least not yet.</p><p></p><p>In the live plant, THC doesn't exist in its active form. It exists as THCA &#8212; a non-intoxicating acid compound. THCA only converts to THC through heat, in a process called decarboxylation. That conversion isn't perfect. You lose roughly 12% in the process, which means the real conversion factor is about 0.877.</p><p></p><p>So the formula looks like this: mg THC per gram = % THC &#215; 10 &#215; 0.877</p><p></p><p>For 22% flower: 22 &#215; 10 &#215; 0.877 = 193mg per gram &#8212; not 220.</p><p></p><p>That gap matters. If you're making a batch of 20 brownies and you're off by 27mg per gram across 3.5 grams of flower, you're off by nearly 95mg total &#8212; almost 5mg per brownie. Enough to turn a mild experience into an overwhelming one, or a strong batch into a disappointing one.</p><p></p><p>The Full Dosing Formula</p><p></p><p>Once you've accounted for decarboxylation, the rest is straightforward:</p><p></p><p>(grams of cannabis &#215; % THC &#215; 10 &#215; 0.877) &#247; number of servings = mg THC per serving</p><p></p><p>Walk through a real example. You're making a batch of 16 cookies using 3.5g of flower at 20% THC.</p><p></p><p>3.5 &#215; 20 &#215; 10 &#215; 0.877 = 614mg total THC. 614 &#247; 16 = 38mg per cookie.</p><p></p><p>That's a strong cookie. A beginning user might expect 5&#8211;10mg. An experienced user comfortable with edibles might target 15&#8211;25mg. At 38mg per cookie, even seasoned consumers should eat half.</p><p></p><p>Running this math before you bake tells you exactly what you're making &#8212; and lets you adjust the recipe before anyone eats anything.</p><p></p><p>Why Standard Serving Sizes Matter</p><p></p><p>The cannabis industry's standard serving size is 5mg THC for beginners and 10mg as a general reference point. These aren't arbitrary &#8212; they're based on clinical research and decades of consumer experience.</p><p></p><p>The practical rule most experienced home cooks use is the dose-down rule: start with the dose you want, not the dose you think you can handle. Edibles take 45 minutes to 2 hours to hit, and the metabolic pathway is completely different from inhaled cannabis. The liver converts THC into 11-hydroxy-THC, which is more potent, longer-lasting, and hits differently than smoked flower. People who regularly smoke cannabis are frequently surprised by edibles at equivalent doses because of this.</p><p></p><p>If you've never had an edible, 5mg is a reasonable starting point. If you have experience, 10&#8211;15mg. Going higher than 25mg before you know how you respond is how people have bad experiences.</p><p></p><p>The Batch Consistency Problem</p><p></p><p>Even when you run the math correctly, batches can still be inconsistent &#8212; not because your math was wrong, but because of how cannabis infuses into fat.</p><p></p><p>THC binds to fat molecules, and fat distribution in a baked good isn't perfectly even. The corner brownie and the center brownie may have different concentrations even if you mixed the batter thoroughly. This is especially true with butter-based recipes.</p><p></p><p>Three things that help: Mix thoroughly &#8212; after incorporating your infused butter or oil, mix more than you think you need to. Use lecithin &#8212; sunflower or soy lecithin is an emulsifier that helps THC bind more uniformly throughout a recipe; a teaspoon per cup of infused fat makes a measurable difference in both potency and consistency. Cut precisely &#8212; if a batch is supposed to be 16 servings, cut 16 equal pieces.</p><p></p><p>The Bigger Picture</p><p></p><p>Most problems people have with edibles &#8212; inconsistent results, accidental overconsumption, batches that don't work &#8212; trace back to one of three things: imprecise decarboxylation, skipping the dosing math, or inconsistent mixing. None of these are complicated to fix once you understand the science behind them.</p><p></p><p>Doing the math changes that. It takes an extra five minutes before you start, and it's the difference between a craft and a guessing game.</p><p></p><p>The CraftPath Academy Edibles Mastery Program covers dosing math, decarboxylation methods, infusion techniques, and 25+ original recipes &#8212; with the science behind all of it. If you want to go deeper, the course is here: https://www.craftpathacademy.com/products/courses/edibles-mastery-program</p><p>Prefer to try it at the lowest price? It&#8217;s on Groupon right now: <a href="https://www.groupon.com/deals/craftpath-academy">https://www.groupon.com/deals/craftpath-academy </a></p><div class="subscription-widget-wrap-editor" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://blog.craftpathacademy.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe&quot;,&quot;language&quot;:&quot;en&quot;}" data-component-name="SubscribeWidgetToDOM"><div class="subscription-widget show-subscribe"><div class="preamble"><p class="cta-caption">Thanks for reading CraftPath Cannabis! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.</p></div><form class="subscription-widget-subscribe"><input type="email" class="email-input" name="email" placeholder="Type your email&#8230;" tabindex="-1"><input type="submit" class="button primary" value="Subscribe"><div class="fake-input-wrapper"><div class="fake-input"></div><div class="fake-button"></div></div></form></div></div>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>